Legal Opinion
Wilson v. Rigali & Veselich
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 29, 1934No. Civ. No. 8949PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GRAY, J., pro tem.
The vendors of two lots in the city of Burbank, each under a separate contract, appeal from a judgment canceling those contracts and awarding to the vendees the total, with interest, of the several installments paid upon those contracts. The court found that appellants induced respondents to purchase the first lot by falsely representing (1) that they would resell said lot within a short time of purchase at a handsome profit, (2) that certain movie studios would be built close to said lot, which would greatly increase its value, (3) that the Sterling movie studio, which…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Spreckels v. GorrillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Lawrence v. GayettyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Goldwater v. OltmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- Gridley v. TilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Harris v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Agricultural Services Association, Incorporated v. Ferry-Morse Seed Company, Incorporated, and Waldo Rohnert Company, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- Boyd v. BevilacquaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Everts v. MattesonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Wetherbee v. United Insurance Co. of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Butler v. NeppleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.