In Re Jones
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, J.
Petitioner was tried under a complaint charging a violation of Ordinance No. 366 as amended by Ordinance No. 370 of the county of Orange, in that he did unlawfully engage in and carry on a “Commercial Hog Ranch” without a permit. The ordinance is entitled “An ordinance regulating the operation and location of hog ranches and providing for the issuance of permits for such business in the county of Orange. ...” Section 2 of the ordinance as amended provides that “it shall be unlawful for any person, firm or corporation to engage in, conduct, manage or carry on a commercial hog ranch, or use any…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Riley v. ChambersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Odd Fellows' Cemetery Ass'n v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Ex Parte HadacheckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Country of Plumas v. WheelerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Ex parte MirandeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Livingston Rock & Gravel Co. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- People v. AmdurCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- People v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Robinson v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Galyon v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.