Legal Opinion

Livingston Rock & Gravel Co. v. County of Los Angeles

California Supreme Court

Decided June 25, 1954No. L. A. 22991PublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.

Plaintiffs sought to enjoin the county of Los Angeles from enforcing against them certain zoning ordinance provisions which would prohibit them from conducting a cement mixing plant in a rezoned district. They recovered judgment upon the premise that the ordinance provisions in question could not be constitutionally applied to require the removal of their existing business as a nonconforming use, and therefore “any action purportedly taken under . . . such provisions [was] invalid and [had] no effect as to . . . plaintiffs. ’ ’ Defendant challenges the propriety of this judgment on these…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Miller v. Board of Public Works of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Zahn v. Board of Public Works of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Wilkins v. City of San BernardinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Jones v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  5. County of San Diego v. McClurkenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. HFH, LTD. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Metromedia, Inc. v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  3. City of Los Angeles v. GageCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  4. Grant v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1957
  5. MATTER OF HARBISON v. City of BuffaloNew York Court of Appeals · 1958

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API