Riley v. Chambers
California Supreme Court
APPLICATION for Writ of Mandamus to require the state controller to audit warrant for expenses of real estate commissioner. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtOlney, J.
The legislature of 1919 passed an act (Stats. 1919, p. 1252), purporting to regulate the business of acting as a real estate broker or salesman in California, creating a state real estate department with an official having the title of real estate commissioner at its head, and pro viding for the payment of the expenses of the department out of a certain fund in the state treasury. The petitioner, Ray L. Riley, was appointed real estate commissioner, incurred certain expenses on account of his department, and sought their payment out of the state treasury in the manner provided by the act. The…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hall v. Geiger-Jones Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
- County of Los Angeles v. Hollywood Cemetery Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Schaezlein v. CabanissCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- City of La Junta v. HeathSupreme Court of Colorado · 1906
3Cited by113 opinions
- Eye Dog Foundation v. State Board of Guide Dogs for the BlindCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- In Re PorterfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- McDonough v. GoodcellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Bank of Italy v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- People v. Globe Grain & Milling Co.California Supreme Court · 1930
108 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.