Ex Parte Hadacheck
California Supreme Court
APPLICATION for a Writ of Habeas Corpus directed to the Chief of Police of the City of Los Angeles. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.
A writ of habeas corpus was issued by this court on the petition of J. C. Hadaeheck, who alleged that he was held in custody under a complaint charging him with the violation of an ordinance of the city of Los Angeles, adopted in April, 1910, and designated No. 19,989, new series. The validity of the ordinance presents the sole question to be here determined.
By the terms of the enactment, it was declared to be unlawful for any person, firm, or corporation to establish, conduct, operate, or maintain, or to cause or permit to be established, operated or maintained, any brickyard or brick kiln,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Mugler v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Dobbins v. Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Campbell v. . SeamanNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
- Odd Fellows' Cemetery Ass'n v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- Miller v. Board of Public Works of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Lockard v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- In Re PorterfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Zahn v. Board of Public Works of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Gin S. Chow v. City of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.