Legal Opinion
Robinson v. City of Los Angeles
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 14, 1956No. Civ. 21757PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAshburn, J.
Plaintiffs-appellants attack as arbitrary and unreasonable ordinance Number 102641, which amended the comprehensive zoning ordinance■ (No. 90500) of the city of Los Angeles so as to rezone approximately 785 acres of vacant land in the northwesterly portion of San Fernando Valley from RA, Al and A2 (agricultural uses) to M2 and M2-0 (light industrial uses). Properties owned by the plaintiffs, some 12 in number, aré not within the rezoned area and are located at distances beyond its confines varying from- 980 to 1,320 feet. Appellants assert that the rezoning was initiated by the city planning…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co. v. Illinois ex rel. Drainage CommissionersSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Miller v. Board of Public Works of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Lockard v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Ayres v. City Council of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Wilkins v. City of San BernardinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Anderson v. City CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Spindler Realty Corp. v. MonningCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Minney v. City of AzusaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Morse v. County of San Luis ObispoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Orinda Homeowners Committee v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.