Legal Opinion

Ex parte Mirande

California Supreme Court

Decided September 13, 1887No. 20335PublishedCited by 43 opinions

Application for a writ of habeas corpus. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtSearls, C. J.

— Petitioner was convicted on a charge of violating the provisions of an ordinance of the board of supervisors of the county of Mono, relating to the business of “ raising, grazing, herding of sheep ” in said county; which ordinance is in the following language:—

“ Ordinance No. 18. .
“ The board of supervisors of the county of Mono, state of California, do ordain as follows:—
“Sec. 1. Every.person engaged in the business of raising, grazing, herding, or pasturing sheep in the county of Mono, state of California, must annually procure a license therefor from the tax collector, and make therefor…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Taylor v. SecorSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. City of St. Louis v. WeberSupreme Court of Missouri · 1869
  3. Ex Parte FrankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1878
  4. People v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Ex parte BenjaminCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. In Re McVickersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. In re ZerbeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Stockton v. PowellSupreme Court of Florida · 1892
  4. Miskimmins v. ShaverWyoming Supreme Court · 1899
  5. In re MartinezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API