Davis v. Pacific Improvement Co.
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from an interlocutory decree of the Superior-Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from an order denying a new trial. J. C. B. Hebbard, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.
The plaintiff brought this action for the partition of a block of land in San Francisco, known as South Beach Block 25, alleging in his complaint that he and the Pacific Improvement Company is each the owner of an undivided half thereof, and that the other defendants, including the appellant herein, “claim to have some interest in the premises described in the complaint herein under a common source of title, but the character and extent of the interest, if any they have, are to the plaintiff unknown”; and prayed that “all the defendants herein be required to exhibit and establish their…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Wells, Fargo & Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Rollins v. WrightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Klumpke v. BakerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Rollins v. WoodmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
3Cited by10 opinions
- Baird v. MonroeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Best v. WohlfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Cordano v. KelseyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
- Dressler v. County of AlpineCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- La Grange Hydraulic Gold Mining Co. v. CarterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.