Rollins v. Wright
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Temple, C.
Appeal from judgment and order refusing new trial.
This action is to quiet title to lots in San Francisco. Plaintiff claims under tax collector’s deeds, and all the questions in the case are as to the validity of such deeds.
There are four tax deeds, — three based on sales made in 1882 for the assessments made in 1881, for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1882, to A. F. Hinchman, the fourth on a sale made in 1880, for an assessment for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1880.
The deeds were read in evidence, against defendant’s objections, which were as follows, so far as urged on this…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Tregambo v. Comanche Mill & Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1881
- De Treville v. SmallsSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Page v. RogersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
- Donald v. BealsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- Oullahan v. SweeneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
3Cited by30 opinions
- Chase v. TroutCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Miller v. McKennaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Ramish v. HartwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Bank of Lemoore v. FulghamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Best v. WohlfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.