Cordano v. Kelsey
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of. Alameda County and from an order denying a new trial. W. S. Wells, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtChipman, P. J.
Plaintiffs brought the action to quiet their title to a certain lot situated in the city of Oakland, claimed by defendants through their purchase of the property at tax sale for the nonpayment of taxes assessed for the fiscal year 1904-5. Plaintiffs had judgment in their favor from which defendants appealed.
The judgment was reversed for the reasons given in our opinion written by Mr. Justice Hart, reported in 19 Cal. App. Dec., p. 823 (No. 988). At the trial it was stipulated that plaintiffs were the owners in fee of the property, “excepting in so far as their title, or the title of either of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Baird v. MonroeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Holland v. HotchkissCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Best v. WohlfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Haight v. TryonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Cadwalader v. NashCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Gottstein v. KellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Hinz v. Musselshell CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1928
- District Bond Co. v. PollackCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Hammond v. City of BurbankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Sawyer v. Berkeley Securities Co.California Court of Appeal · 1929
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.