Legal Opinion

La Grange Hydraulic Gold Mining Co. v. Carter

California Supreme Court

Decided March 18, 1904No. Sac. No. 1029PublishedCited by 19 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Trinity County and from an order denying a new trial. T. E. Jones, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

COOPER, C.

This action was brought to set aside and annul certain orders and entries raising the plaintiff’s assessments on certain properties for the year 1898. Findings were filed upon which judgmérit was entered in favor of defendants. This appeal is from the judgment and the order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial. The claim of appellant is, that the order made by the board of equalization was not sufficient in form, and was not in fact an order raising the plaintiff’s assessments.

Plaintiff, at the proper time, gave to the assessor a verified statement of its taxable property, and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Emery v. San Francisco Gas Co.California Supreme Court · 1865
  2. Buswell v. Board of Supervisors of Alameda CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  3. County of San Luis Obispo v. WhiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Davis v. Pacific Improvement Co.California Supreme Court · 1902

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Los Angeles Gas & Electric Co. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Hammond Lumber Co. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  3. State Ex Rel. Smith v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1953
  4. In Re BasuinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  5. H. & W. Pierce, Inc. v. County of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API