Baird v. Monroe
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, J.
This is an action to quiet title to certain real property, described in the complaint as lot five in block “K” of the Pellissier tract in the city and county of Los Angeles, state of California, as per map recorded in book 15, page 70, miscellaneous records of said county. Defendant Harlan had judgment, and plaintiff appeals from such judgment and from an order denying his motion for a new trial.
Plaintiff’s testator was the owner of the land involved at the time of his death, January 7, 1899, and his estate is still the owner thereof unless title has been divested by either of two deeds. The…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Chase v. TroutCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Deyoe v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- State v. HarmanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1905
- Best v. WohlfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Byrne v. DrainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by68 opinions
- City of Los Angeles v. OliverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Miller v. McKennaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Bank of Lemoore v. FulghamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Miller & Lux Inc. v. SecaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Mercury Herald Co. v. MooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.