Rollins v. Woodman
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from an order denying a new trial. Chas. W. Slack, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Britt, C.
Action to quiet title to a parcel of land in the city and county of San Francisco. At the trial the only evidence offered by plaintiff was a deed following upon a sale of the premises in dispute, made by the tax collector of said city and county, on April 4, 1884, for the taxes of the fiscal year then current, at which sale plaintiff was the purchaser. The court sustained certain objections to the competency of this deed, and rendered judgment for defendants.
The statute in force in 1884 provided that in the delinquent tax list must be set down “ all matters and things contained in…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Hewes v. McLellanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Doland v. MooneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
3Cited by6 opinions
- Baird v. MonroeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Horsky v. McKennanMontana Supreme Court · 1916
- Hinds v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Davis v. Pacific Improvement Co.California Supreme Court · 1902
- Gibson v. SmithSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.