Legal Opinion

Klumpke v. Baker

California Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1900No. S.F. No. 1640PublishedCited by 12 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.

Action to quiet title. Judgment was rendered in favor of the defendants, and the plaintiff has appealed from an order denying a new trial;

The plaintiffs title is based upon certain tax deeds for different portions of the premises described in the complaint, three of the deeds being -for the .taxes thereon for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1883, and one for the succeeding year. The deeds were all executed to the plaintiff July 13, 1886, and this action was commenced July 11, 1891. Upon the introduction of the deeds in evidence the plaintiff rested. Unless, therefore, some evidence was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lake County v. Sulphur Bank Quicksilver Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Cadwalader v. NashCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Trabue Pittman Corp. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Simms v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Bank of Lemoore v. FulghamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  4. White Pine Manufacturing Co. v. MoreyIdaho Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Webster v. SomerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API