Legal Opinion
Dressler v. County of Alpine
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 3, 1976No. Civ. 15749PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FRIEDMAN, J.
Plaintiffs are property taxpayers in Alpine County. They paid taxes under protest and filed four separate refund actions in the superior court, which entered a judgment denying relief in all four actions. The taxpayers appeal.
Necessity for notice of revaluation by State Board of Equalization
In action No. 312 plaintiffs object to the assessment of their properties for the 1970-1971 tax year, charging deprivation of notice- and-hearing opportunities guaranteed by due process of law and by statute. According to unchallenged findings of the trial court, plaintiffs’ properties…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Bi-Metallic Investment Co. v. State Board of EqualizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- County of Los Angeles v. FausCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- De Luz Homes, Inc. v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- People v. Ocean Shore Railroad, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1948
- Sacramento Etc. R.R. Co. v. HeilbronCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Bd. of Sup'rs of Linn Cty. v. Dept. of RevenueSupreme Court of Iowa · 1978
- United States v. County of HumboldtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Farr v. County of NevadaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Mitchell v. California Franchise Tax Board (In Re Mitchell)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Scott-Free River Expeditions, Inc. v. County of El DoradoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.