Legal Opinion

Brinson v. Old Republic Life Insurance Company

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 30, 1957No. 166PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHiggins, J.

The evidence, in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, permits the inference (1) that his left eye was injured in a fall from a truckload of stumps; (2) because of the injury he is blind in the injured eye to the extent he cannot distinguish objects or colors, or tell the difference between day and night, though he can perceive some movement to the side and discover there is a little light when the sun is shining; (3) that the condition is permanent.

The foregoing seems to be a fair summary of the plaintiff’s evidence, both on direct and cross-examination. His statement that he is totally…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Continental Casualty Co. v. LinnCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
  2. International Travelers' Ass'n v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  3. Tracey v. Standard Accident InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1920
  4. Watkins v. United States Casualty Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Bolich v. Provident Life & Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Richardson v. LIBERTY LIFE INSURANCE COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  2. Georgia Life & Health Insurance v. SewellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
  3. James F. Rice v. Military Sales & Service Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1980
  4. Independent Life & Accident Insurance v. WigginsAlabama Court of Appeals · 1961
  5. Cotton v. Provident Life &Casualty Insurance Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API