Bolich v. Provident Life & Accident Insurance
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtCoNNOR, J.
There was evidence at the trial of this action tending to show that plaintiff sustained a bodily injury which was effected solely by the happening of a purely accidental event resulting from the explosion of an automobile, and that plaintiff gave notice to the defendant of his claim under the policy of insurance sued on as soon as was reasonably possible. For this reason there was no error in the refusal of the court to allow the motion of the defendant, at the close of all the evidence, that the action be dismissed by judgment as of nonsuit. The accident did not happen until the mechanic…
2Cited by15 opinions
- Kane v. Order of United Commercial Travelers of AmericaWashington Supreme Court · 1940
- Bailey v. . Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
- Insurance Co v. . Harrison-Wright Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
- North Carolina National Bank v. United States Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1963
- Standard Accident Insurance v. Harrison-Wright Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.