Georgia Life & Health Insurance v. Sewell
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Bell, Presiding Judge.
Defendant enumerates error upon the following portion of the court’s charge to the jury: “If you should find from all the evidence that for all practical purposes, the plaintiff,. Alvin Ray Sewell, has lost the entire sight in his left eye, then this shall amount to the loss of the entire sight of one eye as set forth in the policy.” The question presented is of first impression in Georgia although decisions on the point are available from other jurisdictions.
To recover under a policy provision of the kind in question, loss of sight in the literal sense of absolute…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Continental Casualty Co. v. LinnCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
- International Travelers' Ass'n v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
- Tracey v. Standard Accident InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1920
- Bolich v. Provident Life & Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
- Locomotive Engineers Mutual Life & Accident Ass'n v. VandergriffSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1936
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Strickland v. Gulf Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978
- Travelers Insurance v. PrattCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. SewellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
- Continental Casualty Co. v. WoodwardDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2003
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. SewellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.