Legal Opinion

Watkins v. United States Casualty Co.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1919PublishedCited by 17 opinions

FROM SHELBY. Appeal from the Chancery Court of Shelby County.— HoN. L. H. Peres, Chancellor..

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McKinney

These suits were instituted by the complainant, Dr. Henry C. Watkins, against the defendant Casualty Companies to recover on two accident policies issued to him by the respective defendant companies for the loss of an eye.

The evidence in the two cases is identical. The cases were heard together, and we will dispose of both cases in this opinion.

On May 24, 1914, the United States Casualty Company issued a life and accident policy to the complainant in the principal sum of $7,500. Among other losses insured against the policy insured Dr. Watkins against the loss of the entire sight of one eye,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hatch v. United States Casualty Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
  2. Jennings v. Brotherhood Accident Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1908
  3. Hughes v. Central Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
  4. Peele v. Provident Fund SocietyIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Peoples M. Accident Ass'n v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Continental Casualty Co. v. LinnCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
  2. Pacific Mut. L. Ins. Co. v. McCraryTennessee Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Cooley v. East & West InsuranceTennessee Supreme Court · 1933
  4. King v. Met. Life Ins. Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1936
  5. Locomotive Engineers' Mut. Life & Acc. Ins. v. MeeksMississippi Supreme Court · 1930

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API