Stetson v. Sheehan
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtRichards, J.
This action was submitted to the trial court upon an agreed statement of facts, of which the following is a brief but sufficient summary:
On or about January 11, 1918, in an action pending in the county of San Mateo, wherein George 0. Rich was plaintiff and Micajah Cross and Moss Beach Realty .Company, a corporation, were defendants, a judgment was made and entered in favor of said plaintiff for the recovery against the defendants of the sum of $1,025.94. Thereafter and on January 14, 1918, an execution duly issued upon such judgment, and was delivered to the sheriff of said county, who…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- McMillan v. RichardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
- Bennett v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Halsted v. First Savings BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- In re Estate of SchedelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Bennett v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Kaiser v. MansfieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Menges v. RobinsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Helvey v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Kaiser v. MansfieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Clark v. CuinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.