Legal Opinion
Kaiser v. Mansfield
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 10, 1956No. Civ. 5340PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CONLEY, J. pro tem. *
Roy C. Kaiser, an attorney at law, and his wife, Geraldine C. Kaiser, brought this action to quiet title to 140 acres of land in the Antelope Valley. The defendant and cross-complainant, Margaret Mansfield, and the plaintiff in intervention, Clara Holecheck, resisted the suit, claiming that they were defrauded and victimized by one Lees, predecessor in interest of and an alleged co-conspirator with the plaintiffs, not only as to the specific parcel of property described in the complaint but as to the entire 640 acres of which it formed a part.
The trial resulted in a…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Pico v. CohnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Westphal v. WestphalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Bancroft v. WoodwardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Severance v. Knight-Counihan Co.California Supreme Court · 1947
- Fairchild v. RainesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Busch v. Globe IndustriesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Riddle v. FianoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Rubin v. TobermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Felix v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Kaiser v. MansfieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.