McMillan v. Richards
California Supreme Court
Appeals from, the District Courts of the Seventh and Twelfth .Judicial Districts, Counties of Marin and San Francisco, 'These three cases were argued together, as they all grew out ■of the same transaction. The first of the actions was ejectment, brought by plaintiff against defendants, to recover a tract of land in Marin county, tried before the District Court without a jury.
Read the full summary
Appeals from, the District Courts of the Seventh and Twelfth .Judicial Districts, Counties of Marin and San Francisco, 'These three cases were argued together, as they all grew out ■of the same transaction. The first of the actions was ejectment, brought by plaintiff against defendants, to recover a tract of land in Marin county, tried before the District Court without a jury. The Court rendered a decision in favor of defendants, against plaintiff, whereon judgment was entered. The plaintiff appealed from the judgment, upon the facts as found by the District Court, by which it appeared as…
1Opinion of the CourtField, J.
These three cases were argued together. The first is an action of ejectment; the second, an application fora mandamus; and the third, a bill in equity. In the first, judgment was rendered for the defendants; in the second, a peremptory mandamus was awarded; and in the third, the demurrer was sustained, and the bill dismissed. The first two cases depend upon the same question—the validity of the alleged redemption by McMillan, of the premises in controversy, from the sale under the decree of foreclosure.
The facts, as disclosed by the records, are briefly as follows : In December, 1851, Osio…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Waring v. SmythNew York Court of Chancery · 1847
- Jackson ex dem. Curtis v. BronsonNew York Supreme Court · 1822
- Godeffroy v. CaldwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1852
- Elliot v. Cronk'sNew York Supreme Court · 1834
- Guy v. IdeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1856
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by90 opinions
- Bank of Italy National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. BentleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- Brumagim v. TillinghastCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
- Lord v. MorrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
- Goodenow v. EwerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- Williams v. Santa Clara Mining Ass'n of Balt.California Supreme Court · 1884
85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.