Halsted v. First Savings Bank
California Supreme Court
APPLICATION for a Writ of Supersedeas to restrain the enforcement of a judgment of the Superior Court of Alameda County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. O’Neill & O’Neill, and Chapman & Trefethen, for Appellants.
1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, C. J.
This is an application by the appellants for a writ of supersedeas to restrain the enforcement of a judgment in favor of defendant Anna N. Collins (respondent here) pending their appeal therefrom. This relief is sought on the ground that their duly perfected appeal ipso facto stays the enforcement of the judgment in the respect in which.it is about to be enforced, without the giving by them of any bond to stay proceedings. There is no dispute as to the material facts.
The special administrator of the estate of James M. Halsted, deceased, commenced an action in the superior court of Alameda…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- J. M. Hamilton & Co. v. PrescottTexas Supreme Court · 1889
- Zappettini v. BucklesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Whalen v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- McCallion v. Hibernia Savings & Loan SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Hill v. FinniganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- American Enterprise, Inc. v. Van WinkleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Baar v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Luckenbach v. KrempelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Nuckolls v. Bank of California, National Assn.California Supreme Court · 1936
- Rosenfeld v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.