Clark v. Cuin
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSchauer, J.
In this quiet-title action defendant cross-complained and judgment was rendered in his favor, quieting his title as against plaintiff to some 80 acres of land in Imperial County. Plaintiff appeals. We have concluded that plaintiff’s various contentions are without merit and that the judgment should be affirmed.
According to the record, most of the facts are stipulated and the others appear to be undisputed. The land involved was acquired by the Imperial Horsemen’s Association, a corporation (hereinafter called the association), in 1948. On November 18,1949, the firm of Bratton and Sturges…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Cole v. RushCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- McMillan v. RichardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
- Noble v. BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Robinson v. ThorntonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Bennett v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Salsbery v. RitterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Kaiser v. MansfieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Kaiser v. MansfieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Powers v. PowersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Ritter v. SalsberyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956