Bennett v. Wilson
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Oourt of Plumas County. Stanley A. Smith, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
CHIPMAN, C.
Action to determine the invalidity of a certain judgment lien and that the holder thereof is not a redemp*511tioner, and that plaintiff, under his redemption, is entitled to sheriff’s deed. A demurrer, interposed to the amended complaint upon several grounds, was sustained, and defendants had judgment dismissing the action, from which plaintiff appeals.
The facts alleged which are necessary to illustrate the main question discussed by counsel may he briefly stated. Defendant company is a foreign corporation and owned and operated mining property in Plumas county; defendant Bransford is…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- McMillan v. RichardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
- Wren v. Hynes' administratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1859
- Foorman v. WallaceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Robinson v. ThorntonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Walker v. McCuskerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Difani v. Riverside County Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1927
- Rochin v. Pat Johnson Manufacturing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1998
- North Dakota Horse & Cattle Co. v. SerumgardNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1908
- Luckey v. Superior Court of Los Angeles Cty.California Supreme Court · 1930
- OC Interior Services, LLC v. Nationstar Mortgage, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.