Legal Opinion
Bennett v. Wilson
California Supreme Court
Decided July 16, 1901No. Sac. No. 785PublishedCited by 21 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, C.
The case was before this court on a former appeal, on a judgment for defendants, rendered on demurrer to the complaint, which was reversed. The decision is reported in Bennett v. Wilson, 122 Cal. 509, 1 where the case is thus stated:
“ The facts alleged which are necessary to illustrate the main question discussed by counsel may be briefly stated. Defendant company is a foreign corporation, and owned and operated mining property in Plumas County; defendant Bransford is sheriff of said county; defendant Wilson is a stockholder in and the managing agent and in actual control and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Pierce v. JacksonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1810
- Wren v. Hynes' administratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1859
- Reinhart v. LugoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Hill v. City Cab & Transfer Co.California Supreme Court · 1889
- Bennett v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Gray v. HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Mitchell v. Automobile Owners Indemnity UnderwritersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Associated Oil Co. v. MullinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Mary R. v. B. & R. CORP.California Court of Appeal · 1983
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.