Menges v. Robinson
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtJennings, J.
This is a motion by two defendants to dismiss plaintiff’s appeal from the judgment. Two contentions are urged in support of the motion. The first of these contentions is that the plaintiff in whose favor the judgment was rendered has, subsequent to the institution of the appeal, taken affirmative action upon the judgment from which the appeal is prosecuted, thereby recognizing the validity of the judgment and consequently waiving his right to appeal. The second contention is that plaintiff’s opening brief is fatally defective in that it fails to set forth on the first page thereof a statement…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- County of San Bernardino v. County of RiversideCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- In Re Estate of HubbellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Storke v. StorkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Shaver v. TunsteadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Turner v. MarkhamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Schubert v. ReichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Robert L. Wheeler, Inc. v. ScottSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
- Laubisch v. RoberdoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- DiFrancesco v. Particle Interconnect Corp.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2001
- Epstein v. DeDomenicoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.