Fox v. Flood
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County appointing a receiver in an action to foreclose a mortgage. Grant Jackson, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtNourse, J.
This is an appeal from an order appointing a receiver in an action for the foreclosure of a second mortgage. Coleman R. Flood, the owner of the property at the time of the institution of the action, is the sole appellant. The order was made upon the complaint as amended and affidavits introduced at the hearing.
The second mortgage was given to secure the payment of fifteen thousand dollars, and covers three lots in Venice, California, improved by a hotel building, together with the rents, issues, and profits thereof. The first mortgage is in the sum of twenty thousand dollars. The complaint,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Doak v. BrusonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Whitley v. BradleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
- Boland v. All Persons Etc.California Supreme Court · 1911
- Davies v. RamsdellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Pouder v. TateIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
3Cited by10 opinions
- Goes v. PerryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Sunset Farms, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Breedlove v. J. W. & E. M. BreedLove Excavating Co.California Court of Appeal · 1942
- Moore v. ObergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Barclays Bank of Cal. v. Superior Court of S.F.California Court of Appeal · 1977
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.