Legal Opinion
Sunset Farms, Inc. v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 8, 1935No. Civ. 1928PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJennings, J.
The petitioner has applied for the issuance of a writ of prohibition to prohibit the taking of any further proceedings under an order appointing a receiver on the ground that the order of appointment is void for lack of jurisdiction. The action in which the receiver was appointed was
in the Superior Court of Imperial County by H. W. Everts on June 3,1935. Petitioner was named as a defendant therein. The complaint in said action, in addition to other relief, sought the appointment of a receiver for the property of petitioner pending the trial of the action. On the same date on which the action…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Havemeyer v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Minifie v. RowleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- La Société Française D'Epargnes et de Prévoyance Mutuelle v. Dist. Court of the Fifteenth Judicial Dist.California Supreme Court · 1879
- Elliott v. Superior Court of Cal.California Supreme Court · 1914
- Stanford Hotel Co. v. M. Schwind Co.California Supreme Court · 1919
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Marr v. Postal Union Life Insurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1940
- Goes v. PerryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Schriock v. SchriockNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1964
- Shea v. LeonisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- State Ex Rel. Christensen v. Nugget Coal Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1944
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.