Legal Opinion
Goes v. Perry
California Supreme Court
Decided July 31, 1941No. L. A. No. 16873PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.
The appeal in this action is from an order appointing a receiver of the furniture, furnishings and fixtures contained in the thirteen-story building for which a re*375ceiver was appointed, and the order making such appointment was affirmed by this court in the case of Baumann v. Bedford, L. A. No. 16879 (ante, p. 366 [115 Pac. (2d) 437]), in an opinion this day filed.
The present action is one in claim and delivery to recover possession of said furniture, furnishings and fixtures and was brought by the plaintiff, a purchaser under a deed of trust, against the defendant Will H. Perry, who, it is…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Loughborough v. McNevinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Anderson v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Heeser v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Boles v. StilesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Sunset Farms, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Hansen v. Bear Film Co.California Supreme Court · 1946
- Bowles v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Weaver v. Pasadena Tournament of Roses Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Fish v. Security-First National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Henry v. General Forming, Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1948
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.