Boland v. All Persons Etc.
California Supreme Court
APPEALS from orders of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco denying motions to set aside a judgment by default. George A. Sturtevant, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
In a proceeding under the so-called McEnerney Act (Stats. 1906, [Ex. Sess.], p. 78), the plaintiff obtained judgment declaring him to be the owner in fee of a certain lot in San Francisco. The judgment was rendered, upon default, on May 27, 1907. On December 2, 1907, Dolores V. Stephens, claiming as sole heir of Micaela A. de Morgan, deceased, served and filed a notice of motion to be made on December 13, 1907, to set aside the judgment and open the cause for further proceedings in defense. On May 26, 1908, she was duly appointed as the administratrix of the estate of Micaela A. de Morgan and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Doak v. BrusonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Brownell v. Superior Court of Yolo Cty.California Supreme Court · 1910
- Gray v. LawlorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Bogart v. KieneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
- Thomas v. Superior Court, Etc.California Court of Appeal · 1907
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Lynch v. SpilmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Osmont v. All Persons, Etc.California Supreme Court · 1913
- Kosonen v. WaaraMontana Supreme Court · 1930
- Batchelor v. FinnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Palmer v. LantzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.