Union Oil Co. v. Norton-Morgan Commercial Co.
Arizona Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the County of Maricopa. R. C. Stanford, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtRoss, C. J.
This is an action to quiet title to 4.02 acres of land, a part of the E. % of the S. E. 14 °£ section 36, township 2 north, range 2 east, Maricopa county, Arizona, brought by the Union Oil Company against the Norton-Morgan Commercial Company, Michael Ohl, James Scow, and Katherine Comstock. Comstock defaulted, and Michael Ohl filed a disclaimer, and the plaintiff had judgment quieting its title as against these two defendants. Defendant Scow confesses that the court erred in holding that he had a lien upon plaintiff’s premises, and judgment must be reversed as to him. This leaves the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Forbes v. GraceySupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Lubbock v. McMannCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Traders' National Bank v. SchorrWashington Supreme Court · 1898
- Sanders v. RussellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Harrison v. First Nat. Bank of LewisvilleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- White v. Brown (In Re White)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Smith v. RabbArizona Supreme Court · 1963
- Finerty v. First Nat. Bank of DuncanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Winter v. Glaze (In Re Glaze)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Arizona · 1994
- Security Trust & Savings Bank v. McClureArizona Supreme Court · 1925
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.