Legal Opinion

Waggle v. Worthy

California Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 1887No. 12221PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of Fresno County refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Hayne, C.

This is an action upon a covenant against encumbrances implied by statute, from the use of the word “grant” in a conveyance of real property. (Civ. Code, 1113.) The conveyance was made on July 5,1884. The breach alleged is that the property was at the date of the deed subject to the lien of a judgment “suffered ” by the vendor for $840.30, docketed on the 21st of March, 1884, under which the property was sold and subsequently redeemed by the plaintiff. The cause was submitted on briefs, but no brief for respondents is on file. So far as we can gather, the defenses were two, viz.: 1.…

2Cited by15 opinions

  1. Lubbock v. McMannCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Heine Piano Co. v. BloomerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Demartin v. DemartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Magneson v. Pacific Mfg. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1914
  5. Wentworth v. McDonaldWashington Supreme Court · 1914

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API