Legal Opinion

People v. Salorse

California Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 1882No. 10,752PublishedCited by 26 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of conviction, and from an order denying a new trial, in the Superior Court of San Benito County

1Opinion of the Court

McKee, J.:

This case arises out of an information against the defendant for embezzlement. Conviction followed the trial of the defendant, and on this appeal from the judgment and order denying his motion for a new trial, it is contended on his behalf, that the conviction is erroneous, because the offense committed, if any, was larceny, not embezzlement.

The evidence went to prove that the defendant in March, 1879, in the county of San Benito, hired a horse from its owner for a term of two months, and he agreed that he would use it exclusively in San Benito County, and redeliver it to the owner…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Moffitt v. CresslerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1859
  2. State v. DonovanNevada Supreme Court · 1875
  3. King v. HaneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. People v. MorinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Doble v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Lubbock v. McMannCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Granger v. New Jersey InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  5. In Re O'SheaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API