Maloney v. Hefer
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtSearls, C. J.
This cause was heard and decided by Department One, in an opinion filed November 30,1887.
A rehearing was subsequently granted, and the cause has been reargued before the court in Bank.
Counsel for appellants urges that the effect of the former judgment was to reverse a finding of the court below which was not attacked. We draw no such inference from the decision.
Plaintiffs and appellants sought by their action to quiet title to a lot of land claimed as their homestead, *423having upon it a front and rear house, the former of which was rented to tenants, and the latter occupied by them as a family…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Gregg v. BostwickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
- Mann v. RogersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
- Laughlin v. WrightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
- Tiernan v. His CreditorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
3Cited by23 opinions
- Lubbock v. McMannCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Rosenblum v. LevyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Harbour v. HarbourSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
- Thorsby v. BabcockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Heathman v. HolmesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.