Laughlin v. Wright
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the county of Santa Barbara, and from an order refusing a new trial. The action was brought to foreclose a mortgage executed to secure the payment of a promissory note. The facts bearing upon the points decided appear in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.
The issue raised by the pleadings as to whether the promissory note for the security of which the mortgage sought to be foreclosed was given, had been paid, was the issue in the case, and upon that issue there is no finding. In other respects, also, the findings do not sustain the judgment. The court found the due execution of the note and mortgage on the 20th of November, 1875. The note was for $1479, payable one year after its date, with interest at the rate of one and one half per cent per month, payable monthly, and if not so paid to be compounded monthly. The court also found that the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Gregg v. BostwickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
- Ackley & Dana v. ChamberlainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- Rhodes, Pegram & Co. v. McCormickSupreme Court of Iowa · 1857
- Mann v. RogersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
3Cited by18 opinions
- Hecht v. SlaneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Beronio v. Ventura County Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1900
- Sargeant v. SargeantTexas Supreme Court · 1929
- Lubbock v. McMannCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Rosenblum v. LevyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.