Legal Opinion

CUP Foods, Inc. v. City of Minneapolis

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided September 11, 2001No. C2-01-399PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

G. BARRY ANDERSON, Judge.

Respondent city stayed revocation of relator’s business licenses subject to store closure for six months and compliance thereafter with several conditions. Relator argues that respondent’s decision is not supported by substantial evidence and that the sanction was arbitrary and capricious. Relator also argues that the administrative law judge (ALJ) abused her discretion by denying his motion to strike testimony concerning controlled drug buys. We conclude that there is substantial evidence to support respondent city’s finding of good cause for adverse license…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Cable Communications Board v. Nor-West Cable Communications PartnershipSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  2. Interstate Power Co. v. Nobles County Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  3. City of Minneapolis v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  4. Saxon Coffee Shop, Inc. v. Boston Licensing BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
  5. Mammenga v. State Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Minneapolis Taxi Owners Coalition, Inc. v. City of MinneapolisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
  2. Staeheli v. City of St. PaulCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
  3. Minneapolis Police Department v. KellyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
  4. In Re Relocation Benefits of James Bros. Furniture, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
  5. In Re Request for Issuance of the SDS General Permit MNG300000Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API