Legal Opinion
In Re Relocation Benefits of James Bros. Furniture, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided April 16, 2002No. C6-01-1359PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
G. BARRY ANDERSON, Judge.
Respondent terminated relator’s month-to-month lease. Relator applied for relocation benefits under Minn.Stat. §§ 117.50-56 (1998). Respondent denied relator relocation benefits. A hearing officer determined relator was entitled to relocation benefits. After consulting with relator, a relocation-benefits consultant determined that respondent was liable for $12,433 in relocation benefits. At a subsequent hearing, relator contested the $12,433 determination. The hearing officer denied relator’s claims for benefits in excess of $12,433. Respondent subsequently…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Contested Cases of St. Otto's Home v. Minnesota Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- Markwardt v. State, Water Resources BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Alexander v. United States Department of Housing & Urban DevelopmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Wax 'N Works v. City of St. PaulCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
- Lolling v. Midwest PatrolSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In Re WrenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
- Chanhassen Chiropractic Center, P.A. v. City of ChanhassenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
- In Re WrenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
- Jensen Field Relocation Claims Jensen Field, Inc. v. Board of RegentsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012
- Housing & Redevelopment Authority ex rel. City of Richfield v. WrenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.