Legal Opinion
Mammenga v. State Department of Human Services
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided July 21, 1989No. C1-88-512PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SIMONETT, Justice.
We conclude that the agency rule by which respondent was denied general assistance (GA) benefits is a valid rule. We reverse the court of appeals.
To be eligible for GA benefits, a person must be without certain income and financial resources and, since 1985, must also come within one of the categories for ongo*788ing eligibility. These categories, 16 in number, were installed by the 1985 legislature to limit GA eligibility to persons for whom employment is not a realistic expectation. Thus Minn.Stat. § 256D.05 (1988), which sets out these categories, provides in part that a…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Wickard v. FilburnSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Markwardt v. State, Water Resources BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Contos v. HerbstSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- City of St. Paul v. DalsinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- Manufactured Housing Institute v. PettersenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Brua v. MINNESOTA JOINT UNDERWRITING ASS'NSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- A.A.A. v. Minnesota Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
- Trout Unlimited, Inc. v. Minnesota Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
- Little v. TraynorNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- CUP Foods, Inc. v. City of MinneapolisCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.