Legal Opinion

Cable Communications Board v. Nor-West Cable Communications Partnership

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 26, 1984No. C2-84-865, C4-84-866PublishedCited by 134 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMDAHL, Chief Justice.

Nor-West Cable Communications Partnership, an unsuccessful applicant for a cable communications franchise in the City of St. Paul, appealed to the Court of Appeals from an order of the Minnesota Cable Communications Board. In that order, the Board granted a certificate of confirmation to St. Paul’s franchisee, Continental Ca-blevision of St. Paul, Inc., and denied the request of Nor-West for a contested case proceeding under the Minnesota Administrative Procedure Act (MAPA), Minn.Stat. §§ 14.57-14.62 (1982). The Court of Appeals, by order dated May 29, 1984, remanded the…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Reserve Mining Co. v. HerbstSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  3. Minnesota Power & Light Co. v. Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  4. Crookston Cattle Co. v. Minnesota Department of Natural ResourcesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  5. McKee v. LikinsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by134 opinions

  1. Contested Cases of St. Otto's Home v. Minnesota Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  2. In Re the Excess Surplus Status of Blue Cross & Blue Shield of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
  3. Minnesota Center for Environmental Advocacy v. Minnesota Pollution Control AgencySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
  4. Application of Peoples Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  5. Bird v. State, Department of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985

129 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API