Legal Opinion
Staeheli v. City of St. Paul
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided May 22, 2007No. A06-1146PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MINGE, Judge.
By a certiorari appeal, relator Ron Staeheli challenges the St. Paul City Council’s decision to cancel his license to evaluate homes under the St. Paul Truth-in-Sale-of-Housing program. Because we conclude that the decision was procedurally sufficient, was not based on error of law, was supported by substantial evidence, and was not arbitrary and capricious, we affirm.
FACTS
The St. Paul Truth-in-Sale-of-Housing (TISH) program is designed to provide prospective home buyers with information on the houses they are considering purchasing. Under the program, the city licenses…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Dietz v. Dodge CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- Frank's Nursery Sales, Inc. v. City of RosevilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- CUP Foods, Inc. v. City of MinneapolisCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- State v. NessCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012
- Cannon v. Minneapolis Police DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
- In Re the On-Sale Liquor License, Class BCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
- Mathews v. City of the Village of Minnetonka BeachCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
- Rochester City Lines Co. v. City of RochesterCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.