Legal Opinion

Minneapolis Police Department v. Kelly

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided January 12, 2010No. A09-81PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MINGE, Judge.

By writ of certiorari, relator Minneapolis Police Department (MPD) seeks reversal of the decision by the Minneapolis Commission on Civil Rights (the commission) that MPD officers unfairly discriminated against respondent. We affirm.

FACTS

About noon on January 8, 2004, respondent Phillip Kelly, a middle-aged, African-American resident of Minneapolis, was walking to a convenience store to purchase bread and cigarettes. A Minneapolis park police officer driving in the area heard a dispatch reporting an armed robbery at a nearby business. The robber was described as an…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. State v. AskeroothSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
  3. In Re the Excess Surplus Status of Blue Cross & Blue Shield of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
  4. State Ex Rel. Beaulieu v. RSJ, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
  5. Navarre v. South Washington County SchoolsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. John Hugh Gilmore v. City of MinneapolisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
  2. Cannon v. Minneapolis Police DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
  3. In the Matter of the Appeal by Primrose School of Arden Hills and Shoreview of the Order of License Revocation. ...Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024
  4. John Hugh Gilmore v. City of MinneapolisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
  5. Minneapolis Police Department v. KellyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API