Legal Opinion

United States v. Macy

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided March 9, 1916No. 1636PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, G. A. 7792 (T. D. 35798).

1Opinion of the CourtBaebeR, Judge

The answer to the protest in this case is that the merchandise described on the invoice as “ lead and cotton clo-clo braids ’ ’ consists of dress trimming composed of a cotton braid wound around lead,.the cotton braid chief value. It was returned for duty as a manufacture or article in chief value of cotton braid at 60 per cent ad valorem under the last part of paragraph 358, act of 1913.

Duty was assessed in accordance with the above advisory classification. The importers protested, specifying many grounds thereof, but before the Board of General Appraisers and this court rely wholly upon the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Loewenthal v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
  2. United States v. WalterCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
  3. United States v. BaruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  4. United States v. Burlington Venetian Blind Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
  5. Burlington Venetian Blind Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Akawo & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1941
  2. Mercantil Distribuidora, S. A. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954
  3. Alfred Kohlberg, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1939
  4. R. U. Delapenha & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1963
  5. Bamberger v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1929

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API