United States v. Burlington Venetian Blind Co.
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, G. A. 7360 (T. D. 32503).
1Opinion of the CourtBarber, Judge
The merchandise involved in the several protests in this case is referred to in the record as a “cotton ladder tape.” It is agreed to *379be identical in every particular with that before this court in Burlington Venetian Blind Co. v. United States (1 Ct. Cust. Appls., 374; T. D. 31456). Here, as there, the merchandise was assessed for duty as “tapes” under the provisions of paragraph 349 of the tariff act of 1909.
In the first case the importers’ contention was that the so-called tapes were not ejusdem generis with the other merchandise mentioned in paragraph 349, and therefore under the doctrine…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- United States v. Kwong Yuen ShingCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1910
- Burlington Venetian Blind Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
3Cited by15 opinions
- United States v. WalterCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
- Smillie v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924
- United States v. MacyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
- Western Blind & Screen Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1919
- Akawo & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1941
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.