Legal Opinion

Acker v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided March 20, 1911No. 159PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from United States Circuit Court for Southern District of New York, Abstract 22211 (T. D. 30142).

1Opinion of the CourtDe Vries, Judge

This is an appeal from a decision of the Circuit Court for the Southern District of New York affirming a decision of the Board of General Appraisers. The importation is of “chutney.” It was assessed for dutiable purposes by the collector of customs at the port of New York as “fruits preserved in sugar, molasses, spirits, or in their own juices,” under paragraph 263 of the tariff act of 1897. The importers allege that the proper dutiable classification is under paragraph 262 *329as “ other edible fruits * * * when dried, desiccated, evaporated, or prepared in any manner,” or as an unenumerated…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Handley v. StutzSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. American Net & Twine Co. v. WorthingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  3. Maillard v. LawrenceSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
  4. Newman v. ArthurSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  5. Maddock v. MagoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1894

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. United States v. WalterCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
  2. Bloomingdale Bros. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
  3. Wanamaker v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  4. Burgess Battery Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1947
  5. Draeger Shipping Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API