Legal Opinion
New Hampshire Insurance v. Foxfire, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided April 1, 1993No. C-91-2940-MHP, C-91-3464-MHPPublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
PATEL, District Judge.
New Hampshire Insurance Company (“NHICO”) filed civil action number C-91-2940 seeking a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured, Foxfire, Inc. (“Foxfire”) in connection with an action (“underlying action”) brought in Contra Costa County, California, Superior Court against Foxfire and its principal, James G. Sullivan (“Sullivan”) by Toyon Associates, Inc. (“Toyon”). 1 Foxfire, in turn, filed civil action number C-91-3464 against NHICO. 2
After consolidation, this court stayed the instant actions pending the California…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Gray v. Zurich Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1966
- Bank of the West v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- CNA Casualty of California v. Seaboard Surety Co.California Court of Appeal · 1986
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Hameid v. National Fire Insurance of HartfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- Solers, Inc. v. Hartford Casualty InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2001
- Sentex Systems, Inc. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.District Court, C.D. California · 1995
- Select Design, Ltd. v. Union Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1996
- New Hampshire Insurance v. R.L. Chaides Construction Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1994
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.