Legal Opinion
Sentex Systems, Inc. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
District Court, C.D. California
Decided February 22, 1995No. CV 93-5227 RAP(EEx)PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON LIABILITY ISSUE
PAEZ, District Judge.
Upon full consideration of the pleadings, the moving, opposition, and reply papers, the evidence submitted by the parties, and the oral arguments of counsel, the court hereby GRANTS plaintiffs motion for summary judgment and DENIES defendant’s motion for summary judgment.
Introduction
This action involves a dispute between an insured and its insurer. The main issue before the court is whether Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. (“Hartford”) breached its duty to defend Sentex Systems, Inc.…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- The Frog, Switch & Manufacturing Co., Inc., in No. 98-7552 v. The Travelers Insurance Company (d.c. Civ. No. 98-Cv-00643) the Frog, Switch & Manufacturing Co., Inc., in No. 98-7553 v. United States Fire Insurance Company (d.c. Civ. No. 98-Cv-00758)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- Hyman v. Nationwide Mutual Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
- Atlantic Mutual Insurance v. J. Lamb, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2002
- Lexmark International, Inc. v. Transportation InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001
- FMC Corp. v. Plaisted & CompaniesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.