Legal Opinion

Hameid v. National Fire Insurance of Hartford

California Supreme Court

Decided July 3, 2003No. S104157PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CHIN, J.

We granted review to determine a limited issue: When a plaintiff alleges in an underlying complaint that an insured defendant took a competitor’s customer list and solicited customers from it, was the defendant’s act a misappropriation of advertising ideas that gave rise to the insurer’s duty to defend defendant under the “advertising injury” provision of the commercial general liability (CGL) insurance policy? (On May 15, 2002, we filed the order specifically limiting the issue on review to coverage under the advertising injury provision.) We conclude the term “advertising…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Waller v. Truck Insurance Exchange, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Gray v. Zurich Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Bank of the West v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  4. AIU Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Buss v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Scottsdale Ins. Co. v. MV TRANSP.California Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Farris v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  3. Hudson Insurance v. Colony InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  4. Holyoke Mut. Ins. Co. v. Vibram USA, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2018
  5. Dish Network Corp. v. Arch Specialty InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API