Legal Opinion

CNA Casualty of California v. Seaboard Surety Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 14, 1986No. A021608PublishedCited by 182 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BARRY-DEAL, J.

This appeal raises important issues regarding the extent of the responsibility of insurance carriers to provide their insured with a defense. Seaboard Surety Company (Seaboard), Insurance Company of North America (INA), and Pacific Indemnity Company (Pacific) (collectively appellants) appeal from a judgment ordering them under principles of equitable contribution to pay respondent and cross-appellant CNA Casualty of California (CNA) a portion of the legal expenses incurred by CNA in defending a lawsuit against their insured, Western States Bankcard Association (WSBA). We…

2Cases cited55 opinions

  1. Gray v. Zurich Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Clemmer v. Hartford Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Albertson v. RaboffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Brandt v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Ruder & Finn Inc. v. Seaboard Surety Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1981

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by182 opinions

  1. Waller v. Truck Insurance Exchange, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Montrose Chemical Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Horace Mann Ins. Co. v. Barbara B.California Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Montrose Chemical Corp. v. Admiral InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Shade Foods, Inc. v. Innovative Products Sales & Marketing, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2000

177 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API