CNA Casualty of California v. Seaboard Surety Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BARRY-DEAL, J.
This appeal raises important issues regarding the extent of the responsibility of insurance carriers to provide their insured with a defense. Seaboard Surety Company (Seaboard), Insurance Company of North America (INA), and Pacific Indemnity Company (Pacific) (collectively appellants) appeal from a judgment ordering them under principles of equitable contribution to pay respondent and cross-appellant CNA Casualty of California (CNA) a portion of the legal expenses incurred by CNA in defending a lawsuit against their insured, Western States Bankcard Association (WSBA). We…
2Cases cited55 opinions
- Gray v. Zurich Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1966
- Clemmer v. Hartford Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
- Albertson v. RaboffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Brandt v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Ruder & Finn Inc. v. Seaboard Surety Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1981
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by182 opinions
- Waller v. Truck Insurance Exchange, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1995
- Montrose Chemical Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Horace Mann Ins. Co. v. Barbara B.California Supreme Court · 1993
- Montrose Chemical Corp. v. Admiral InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Shade Foods, Inc. v. Innovative Products Sales & Marketing, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2000
177 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.