Legal Opinion
New Hampshire Insurance v. R.L. Chaides Construction Co.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided January 7, 1994No. C-92-2207 MHPPublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
PATEL, District Judge.
New Hampshire Insurance Company (“NHICO”) filed this action seeking a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured, R.L. Chaides Construction Co., Inc. (“Chaides”) in connection with an action (“underlying action”) brought in United States District Court. The underlying action was brought by A.C. Aukerman Company (“Aukerman”) against Chaides, R.L. Chaides, and R.L. Chaides Equipment Co. 1 Now before the court is NHICO’s motion for summary judgment on its second claim for relief. NHICO moves for a judicial declaration…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Gray v. Zurich Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1966
- Bank of the West v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Hewlett-Packard Company, Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Bausch & Lomb IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Elan Pharmaceutical Research Corp. v. Employers InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
- Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
- Simply Fresh Fruit, Inc. v. The Continental Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Hameid v. National Fire Insurance of HartfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- Union Ins. Co. v. Land and Sky, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1995
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.